A
If your child says they have sudden, severe pain that keeps getting worse, go to the hospital at once; don't make them hold out until school lets out
Value for cost Very high
In plain termsSome conditions are measured in hours. A boy with sudden, severe pain on one side of the scrotum has testicular torsion: the blood vessel the testicle hangs from has twisted, and the blood supply is cut off. Treated within 6 hours, the testicle is saved in 97.2% of cases. Delayed to 19 to 24 hours, only 42.5%. This pain cannot wait until school lets out, and it cannot wait until the exam is over.
- Cost
- No money. Take half a day off and take your child to register at the emergency department.
No money
Done in passing
No willpower
Benefit size large
- Benefit
- Following the rules for a systematic search, 30 case series with 2116 patients with testicular torsion were gathered and looked at together. Of these, 1283 cases were tallied in 6-hour bands. Counting from when the pain began, at 0 to 6 hours the testicle was saved in 97.2%. At 7 to 12 hours, 79.3%. At 13 to 18 hours, 61.3%. At 19 to 24 hours, 42.5%. At 25 to 48 hours, 24.4%. Beyond 48 hours, 7.4%. Combined into larger bands: within 12 hours, 90.4%; 13 to 24 hours, 54.0%; beyond 24 hours, 18.1%. The authors conclude that the time within which the testicle can be saved can be longer than the commonly cited 6 to 8 hours. So even if the pain has gone on for a long time, still go and get it treated; don't stay home because “it's too late anyway”
- Evidence grade
- A
- Notes
- Tell boys ahead of time: if you get sudden, severe pain down there, say so right away, and don't be embarrassed. Testicular torsion occurs mostly in adolescent boys, and many of them just bear it because it is hard to talk about. Other conditions that are also counted in hours include acute appendicitis (left too long, it can perforate), diabetic ketoacidosis and meningitis. For these, this chapter has not verified one by one “how much worse it gets after how many hours.” Their shared signal is: it comes on suddenly, keeps getting worse, and is unlike any previous episode. For how to recognize an acute emergency and how to call for transport, see Section 13.
A
Don't put off needed treatment to “wait until the exams are over”; some windows follow bone age, not the exam schedule
Value for cost High
In plain termsScoliosis is the spine curving to the side. A brace is a hard-shell vest worn on the body to hold the spine up. Worn while the bones are still growing, 75% of children did not curve far enough to need surgery; among those only observed without a brace, just 42%. The time when a brace can be worn follows when the bones finish growing, not the high school or college entrance exams; wait until the exams are over and often only surgery is left.
- Cost
- No money; the only thing to decide is whether to do it earlier or later. Taking time off and follow-up visits take time, and the cost of the treatment itself is separate. The hard part is that the brace must be worn at least 18 hours a day, and the child has to keep putting up with it.
No money
Done in passing
Lots of willpower
Benefit size large
- Benefit
- In a trial run jointly by several hospitals, 242 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who qualified for a brace were enrolled. Of these, 116 were randomized, and 126 chose for themselves whether to wear a brace. How success and failure would be counted was fixed in advance: a curve growing to 50 degrees or more counted as treatment failure, and not having reached that degree when the bones finished growing counted as treatment success. Results were counted by the group each person was first assigned to, regardless of whether they later actually wore the brace enough. The success rate was 75% in the group randomized to a brace and 42% in the group randomized to observation only (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.85–9.16); the odds of success were about 4 times those with observation only. Counting the randomized group and the self-selected group together, it was 72% versus 48% (after evening out the differences the two groups started with, OR 1.93, 1.08–3.46, still about 1.9 times). The more hours a day the brace was worn, the higher the success rate (P<0.001: this relationship is unlikely to be chance). The trial was stopped early because the brace clearly worked
- Evidence grade
- A
- Notes
- Scoliosis is used as the example here because it has a randomized trial, it has a clear time window, and it happens to be one of the focus items of the student health checkup (see Item 7). Similar cases include strabismus, amblyopia, tooth decay, and the kind of congenital heart disease surgery whose timing can be chosen. What they have in common is that the later they are done, the worse the result or the higher the cost. Ask a specialist about the specific window. If you are worried about missing classes, during compulsory education a child can take a leave of absence for up to 1 year, with their enrollment status (学籍) kept for them; see Item 11.
A
If your child is bullied, report it to the school that same day and ask for written handling; if it involves hitting, taking money or spreading rumors, call the police directly
Value for cost High
In plain termsChildren bullied by peers are about 2.2 times as likely as children who are not bullied to develop suicidal thoughts, and about 2.6 times as likely to have engaged in suicidal behavior. When the school receives a report it must investigate immediately; if it is determined to be bullying there must be discipline, and serious cases must not be covered up and must be reported to the public security authorities. So report it the same day, ask for the determination procedure to be followed, and leave a written record.
- Cost
- No money. Go to the homeroom teacher, and also to the school's student-bullying governance body. To report to the police, call 110 (police). The hard part is standing firm against advice like “don't make a big deal of it.”
No money
Done in passing
Some willpower
Benefit size large
- Benefit
- 34 studies with 284,375 children and adolescents, counted together. Being bullied by peers was associated with suicidal ideation, OR 2.23 (95% CI 2.10–2.37): the odds of having such thoughts were about 2.2 times those of children who were not bullied. Another 9 studies with 70,102 people: being bullied was associated with suicide attempts, OR 2.55 (1.95–3.34), about 2.6 times. The results held regardless of sex, age and the quality of the studies themselves. The association between cyberbullying and suicidal ideation was stronger than for offline bullying. Article 21 of the Provisions on the School Protection of Minors (未成年人学校保护规定) lists five types of behavior: hitting, kicking, slapping, scratching and biting, pushing and shoving, pulling and dragging; verbal abuse, mockery, and insulting nicknames; snatching, forcibly taking or deliberately destroying property; malicious exclusion and isolation; and fabricating facts online to defame someone or spreading rumors. The article also provides that where the side with the advantage in age, physique or numbers does these things deliberately or maliciously, causing physical injury, property loss or mental harm, it may be determined to be bullying. Article 22 requires teaching staff who notice a student's abnormal mood or physical injuries to find out what is going on promptly and report it. Article 23 requires the school, on receiving a report, to investigate immediately, submit the matter to the bullying governance body for determination and handling, and notify the parents to take part. Where bullying is determined, educational discipline or a disciplinary sanction must be imposed. Serious bullying that violates public security administration or is suspected of being a crime must not be concealed, and should be reported promptly to the public security authorities and the education administration department (nationwide, in effect from September 1, 2021)
- Evidence grade
- A
- Notes
- If your child has injuries with no clear explanation, suddenly refuses to go to school, or keeps losing things, first ask about it using the signals in Article 22. This analysis combining many studies only tracked and recorded, without randomized groups, so it cannot prove that bullying alone causes suicide, but the direction and size of the risk are clear. The Plan to Strengthen Comprehensive Governance of Bullying Among Primary and Secondary School Students (加强中小学生欺凌综合治理方案) additionally requires strictly distinguishing bullying from horseplay and joking around between students. So the school has a duty to make a determination, and cannot dismiss it with “kids are just messing around.”
A
Have your child spend a full 2 hours outdoors every day; this is currently the only way to prevent myopia that is backed by randomized trials
Value for cost High
In plain termsWhen first graders in primary school got an extra 40 minutes of outdoor class each day, the share of children newly becoming nearsighted over three years fell from about four in ten to about three in ten. The amount the health commission gives is at least 2 hours outdoors in the daytime every day, or 14 hours a week in total. Cloudy days count, and standing outside during class breaks counts too.
- Cost
- No money. But you have to make room for it every day, mostly squeezed out of time for homework and online classes. The hard part is doing it every day, not just a few times and done.
No money
A few hours
Some willpower
Benefit size large
- Benefit
- First graders at 12 primary schools in Guangzhou were randomized by school (952 children at intervention schools, 951 at control schools, average age 6.6). The intervention added 1 outdoor activity class of 40 minutes on each school day, and encouraged parents to take their children outdoors more outside school. The share newly becoming nearsighted over 3 years was 30.4% in the intervention group, 259 of 853 eligible children; and 39.5% in the control group, 287 of 726. The difference between the groups was -9.1 percentage points (95% CI -14.1 to -4.1, P<0.001): the true gap is roughly between 4 and 14 percentage points fewer. The increase in prescription over 3 years (change in spherical equivalent) was -1.42 D versus -1.59 D, a difference of 0.17 D (P=0.04). The intervention group's myopia deepened slightly less. D is the unit used to measure prescription strength. For growth in axial length (the front-to-back length of the eyeball), no difference could be seen between the groups (P=0.07). The Ten Key Points on Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents (防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条) requires children and adolescents to have at least 2 hours of daytime outdoor activity each day, or 14 hours cumulative per week. It notes that outdoor activity is protective even on cloudy days, and requires avoiding the hot hours of strong sun after noon
- Evidence grade
- A
- Notes
- This trial ran for only 3 years, and the children in it all started at age 6. A 9.1-percentage-point difference in myopia between the two groups can only keep some children from becoming nearsighted; it cannot guarantee that a child won't. The same Ten Key Points gives several more practices. Reading and writing should follow “one chi, one fist, one cun” (一尺一拳一寸). After 20 minutes of close-up eye use, look into the distance for at least 20 seconds. Primary and secondary school students using electronic screens for purposes other than study should not exceed 15 minutes at a time or 1 hour a day in total. “Being outdoors” and “having PE class” are not the same thing; standing outside during class breaks counts too.
B
No screens from 0 to 3, as little as possible from 3 to 6, and for primary and secondary school students no more than 1 hour a day of non-study use
Value for cost Standard
In plain termsThe National Health Commission requires no screens for ages 0 to 3, as little contact as possible for ages 3 to 6, and for primary and secondary school students, non-study use of no more than 15 minutes at a time and no more than 1 hour a day. The reason given is that prolonged close-up eye use makes myopia come earlier. The evidence linking screens and myopia is not that solid; what has actually been shown to work in trials is 2 hours outdoors every day.
- Cost
- No money. The hard part is taking the screen out of the child's hands, and also that parents themselves have to look at screens less in front of the child.
No money
Done in passing
Lots of willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- The fourth point of the Ten Key Points on Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents (防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条) reads, word for word: “Infants and toddlers aged 0 to 3 do not use video electronic products such as mobile phones, tablets and computers; young children aged 3 to 6 should avoid contact with and use of video electronic products such as mobile phones, tablets and computers as far as possible; for primary and secondary school students, a single session of using electronic screens for non-study purposes should not exceed 15 minutes, and the cumulative time per day should not exceed 1 hour.” The same point states that “prolonged close-range use of electronic video products easily uses up children's hyperopia reserve and is an important cause of the early onset and high prevalence of myopia in children and adolescents.” The 2018 implementation plan from eight departments including the Ministry of Education gives parents the same requirements, adding one sentence: “the younger the child, the shorter the time of continuous use of electronic products should be.” The research evidence is much weaker: a systematic review included 33 studies, 11 of which went into the pooled calculation, with subjects ranging from 3 months to 33 years old. Counting only phones and tablets, the odds ratio for myopia was 1.26 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.60, I²=77%). Combined with computers, it was 1.77 (1.28 to 2.45, I²=87%). The authors' conclusion goes only as far as “possibly associated,” and states that none of the 33 studies had a reliable measurement of screen time
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- It is graded B because what the authorities give is a set of rules by tier, not a figure measured in a trial. The lower bound of the odds ratio from the research sits right at 1.00, and the authors only dare to say “possibly associated.” So treat it as a house rule that is easy to enforce, not as “no screens means no myopia.” What is actually backed by randomized trials is Item 4 (2 hours outdoors). Preschoolers' eyes need checking too: the same document states that at 1 to 3 years, 4 to 6 years and after 7 years, children should have regular refraction screening to see how much hyperopia reserve remains; for how it is checked, see Item 12 (cycloplegic refraction). The link between screens and children's language skills has also been meta-analyzed: 42 studies, 18905 people; the more screen time, the weaker the language skills (r=−0.14, 95% CI −0.18 to −0.10). But watching together, and watching programs with educational content, were, the other way around, positively associated (r=0.16 and 0.13). This is correlation, not causation; it only shows that using screens in place of talking with your child is a bad trade.
- Sources
- 国家卫生健康委办公厅 (2023). 防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条(国卫办妇幼函〔2023〕278 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202307/content_6894284.htm ; 教育部等八部门 (2018). 综合防控儿童青少年近视实施方案(教体艺〔2018〕3 号). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A17/moe_943/s3285/201808/t20180830_346672.html ; Foreman J, Salim AT, Praveen A, et al. (2021). Association between digital smart device use and myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(12), e806-e818. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00135-7 ; Madigan S, McArthur BA, Anhorn C, Eirich R, Christakis DA (2020). Associations between screen use and child language skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(7), 665-675. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0327
A
Treat myopia as lasting damage: the stronger the prescription, the more retinal detachment, macular disease and glaucoma later on
Value for cost Very high
In plain termsMyopia does not get better on its own, and the prescription cannot come back down. Nor is it just a matter of “wearing glasses.” Compared with people who are not nearsighted, the likelihood of myopic maculopathy is a dozen-odd times higher with mild myopia and several hundred times higher at 600 degrees or more. For retinal detachment, it is about 3 times higher with mild myopia and about 13 times higher at 600 degrees or more. So the earlier a child becomes nearsighted and the faster it progresses, the greater the risk they will carry later on.
- Cost
- No money. There is nothing to do for this item itself; what to do is in Items 4 and 5 (2 hours outdoors, managing screens by age).
No money
Done in passing
No willpower
Benefit size large
- Benefit
- A systematic review and meta-analysis pooled studies from before June 2019 and split prescriptions into three tiers: low (−0.5 to −3.00 D), moderate (−3.00 to −6.00 D) and high (≤−6.00 D, 600 degrees or more). Compared with people who are not nearsighted, the odds ratios for myopic macular degeneration were, in order, 13.57 (95% CI 6.18 to 29.79), 72.74 (33.18 to 159.48) and 845.08 (230.05 to 3104.34). For retinal detachment, in order, 3.15 (1.92 to 5.17), 8.74 (7.28 to 10.50) and 12.62 (6.65 to 23.94). For posterior subcapsular cataract, in order, 1.56 (1.32 to 1.84), 2.55 (1.98 to 3.28) and 4.55 (2.66 to 7.75). For open-angle glaucoma, low myopia was 1.59 (1.33 to 1.91), and moderate and high combined was 2.92 (1.89 to 4.52). For visual impairment after age 60, the odds ratios for the three tiers were, in order, 1.71 (1.07 to 2.74), 5.54 (3.12 to 9.85) and 87.63 (34.50 to 222.58). The Ten Key Points on Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents (防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条) says the same: 600 degrees or more is high myopia; in this group, the incidence of blinding eye diseases such as cataract, open-angle glaucoma, myopic maculopathy, retinal detachment and myopic optic neuropathy is markedly higher than in other groups; and “myopia can be prevented and controlled, but it is irreversible”
- Evidence grade
- A
- Notes
- The studies pooled are all observational, and the odds ratios are unusually large. For high myopia and macular degeneration, the confidence interval runs from 230 to 3104, which shows the underlying studies differ a great deal; the figures can be read only for their order of magnitude, not used as precise values. Most of these complications show up only in middle and old age. Myopia itself is not a disability; the vast majority of people have normal vision once corrected with glasses. But myopia is not over once you get a pair of glasses; it is worth the effort to delay it and control it. For follow-up checks after diagnosis, see Item 12 (cycloplegic refraction). Don't buy products that claim to cure it; see Item 9 (curing myopia).
B
Read the report from the yearly student health checkup yourself, and take any abnormal findings to a hospital that same year
Value for cost High
In plain termsPrimary and secondary schools organize a student health checkup once a year. The focus items on the report are overweight, obesity, malnutrition, abnormal spinal curvature, poor vision and tooth decay, and these are the ones most easily left to slide. Don't just glance at height and weight and put the report away. If any of these items is abnormal, take your child to a specialist that same year and get it checked out.
- Cost
- No money. During compulsory education, the checkup fee is paid out of the school's public operating funds; parents don't pay anything extra.
No money
Done in passing
No willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- The Measures for the Administration of Health Checkups for Primary and Secondary School Students (2021 Edition) (中小学生健康体检管理办法(2021 年版)) provide that primary and secondary schools organize 1 health checkup a year for their enrolled students. The surgical examination covers the head, neck, chest, spine, limbs, skin and lymph nodes. The eye examination covers the outer appearance of the eyes, distance vision and refraction (how nearsighted or farsighted the eyes are). The report given to each individual should include the findings, an overall assessment and health guidance recommendations. Of these, overweight, obesity, malnutrition, abnormal spinal curvature, poor vision and dental caries (tooth decay) must be the focus of guidance. Education administration departments should set up files on students found to have health problems and follow up with them (record them, then keep following up afterward). During compulsory education, student health checkup fees are paid out of the school's public operating funds, and parents don't pay anything extra (nationwide, issued September 2021)
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- It is graded B because this is a document that sets out what schools must do, not a study of effects. What it guarantees is “check every year, check these items, follow up when something abnormal is found,” not that someone will take care of whatever is found. The checkup is only a first screening, not a diagnosis. Poor vision needs cycloplegic refraction at an eye department (Item 12). Abnormal spinal curvature needs orthopedics or spinal surgery (Item 2, don't delay treatment to wait until the exams are over). Parents have to take the child for both of these steps themselves.
B
Have children aged 12 to 18 screened once for depression; don't take the school's psychological assessment as a diagnosis
Value for cost High
In plain termsUS preventive guidelines recommend screening children aged 12 to 18 for major depression; for ages 11 and under, the evidence is insufficient. Suicide is the second leading cause of death among children aged 10 to 19. The school's yearly psychological assessment is only a general survey and cannot serve as a diagnosis. If your child says they feel awful, or their eating, sleep, interests or grades suddenly change, go straight to a psychiatry or clinical psychology department.
- Cost
- 0 to a few tens of yuan, to fill in a screening questionnaire at a community clinic or a hospital outpatient department. Calls to the two hotlines, 12355 and 12356, are free.
No money
Done in passing
No willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- The US Preventive Services Task Force issued a recommendation statement in 2022. It recommends screening adolescents aged 12 to 18 for major depressive disorder (a grade B recommendation). Grade B means moderate certainty and, on balance, a moderate benefit: worth doing. For screening children aged 11 and under for major depression, the evidence is insufficient (an I statement, meaning the evidence is not enough to give a recommendation). For screening children and adolescents specifically for suicide risk, the evidence on both benefits and harms is insufficient (I statement). The document points out that suicide is the second leading cause of death among people aged 10 to 19. It also points out that major depression in children and adolescents is closely linked to many later problems. These include recurrent depression in adulthood, other mental disorders, and a higher risk of suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts and death by suicide. The Ten Measures to Further Strengthen Mental Health Work for Primary and Secondary School Students (进一步加强中小学生心理健康工作十条措施) requires building a three-tier service system of homeroom teachers, full-time and part-time mental health teachers, and psychiatrists. Each student takes a psychological assessment each school year, generally no more than 1 time. The document also requires advancing mechanisms for referral to medical care for mental illness and for returning to school after recovery. It requires drawing on the 12355 youth service platform and the 12356 psychological assistance hotline (nationwide, issued October 2025)
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- It is graded B because the original gives a rating of recommendation strength, not an effect that can be converted into a number. It is also an American recommendation; there is no corresponding official screening recommendation in China. A positive screening result only means another assessment is needed; it does not equal a diagnosis. For what to do when there are suicidal thoughts, see Section 1, Item 25. For how the family copes, see Section 29.
B
Don't buy products and services that claim to “cure myopia” or “lower the prescription”
Value for cost High
In plain termsThe State Administration for Market Regulation says plainly that “under current medical technology, myopia cannot be cured.” Claims such as “restore,” “lower the prescription,” “myopia cured” and “prescription repair” are to be investigated and punished strictly. When you see words like these, rule the product out right away; there is no need to compare prices. Eye-care devices count as medical devices, and e-commerce platforms are responsible for checking whether sellers are qualified to sell them.
- Cost
- No money; on the contrary, it saves you this money.
No money
Done in passing
No willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- The notice from the General Office of the State Administration for Market Regulation on a special campaign running from November 2021 to March 2022 states clearly: “under current medical technology, myopia cannot be cured.” The notice requires strict investigation and punishment, according to law, of marketing myopia prevention and control products for children and adolescents with misleading terms such as “rehabilitation,” “restore,” “lower the prescription,” “myopia cured,” “myopia nemesis” and “prescription repair.” The notice requires stronger enforcement against conduct that fraudulently uses the name of traditional Chinese medicine, or falsely invokes traditional Chinese medicine theory and techniques in marketing, to deceive consumers. The notice also requires a severe crackdown on two kinds of false and illegal advertising: ads that use patients' names or images to show before-and-after treatment comparisons, and ads that make guarantees about the safety or efficacy of treatment. The notice requires e-commerce platforms to strictly carry out their responsibility to review the business qualifications for eye-care devices and other medical devices and related special goods (checking whether sellers are qualified to sell them) (nationwide)
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- It is graded B because it rests on the standard regulators apply when investigating, not on controlled trials of the products. But on the statement “myopia cannot be cured,” the health authorities and the regulators agree: the Ten Key Points on Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents (防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条) says “myopia can be prevented and controlled, but it is irreversible.” The two things that really have evidence are in Item 4 (outdoors) and Item 12 (proper refraction, glasses fitting and follow-up checks). For blue-light-blocking glasses, see Section 6.
B
Sleep, homework, physical activity and rankings all have written rules; if the school falls short, you can raise it
Value for cost Standard
In plain termsThe documents state 10 hours of sleep a day for primary school students, 9 hours for junior high and 8 hours for senior high. Morning classes in primary school generally start no earlier than 8:20, and in secondary school no earlier than 8:00. In 2025 it was further set that there be at least 2 hours of physical activity a day and no ranking by exam scores. If your child is short of sleep for a long time, first check against these provisions; don't start by blaming the child for dawdling.
- Cost
- No money. You only need to know the provisions, and if necessary raise it with the school or the local education administration department. The hard part is speaking up.
No money
Done in passing
Some willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- The Notice on Further Strengthening Sleep Management for Primary and Secondary School Students (关于进一步加强中小学生睡眠管理工作的通知) provides: primary school students should get 10 hours of sleep a day, junior high students 9 hours, and senior high students 8 hours. Morning classes in primary school generally start no earlier than 8:20, and in secondary school generally no earlier than 8:00. Schools must not require students to arrive early for unified teaching activities. Primary school students generally go to bed no later than 21:20, junior high students no later than 22:00, and senior high students no later than 23:00. Off-campus tutoring institutions must end training no later than 20:30, and online livestreamed training must end no later than 21:00. From 22:00 each day to 8:00 the next day, game services must not be provided to minors (nationwide, issued March 2021). The Ten Measures to Further Strengthen Mental Health Work for Primary and Secondary School Students (进一步加强中小学生心理健康工作十条措施) adds several provisions: fully implement at least 2 hours of comprehensive physical activity a day for primary and secondary school students, and encourage a “15-minute class break.” It also provides that students must not be ranked by exam scores, strictly prohibits assigning mechanical, repetitive or punitive homework, and encourages setting one “homework-free day” each week (nationwide, issued October 2025)
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- Both are documents issued by the competent authorities. How far each locality and each school carries them out varies a great deal, so this item is graded B. Their use is to let you know which things the school should be doing anyway, so you have grounds in hand when you go to talk. For the sleep accounting for adults, see Sections 2 and 3.
B
If your child can't cope anymore, they can take a leave of absence from school; the school must keep their enrollment status for them, for up to 1 year
Value for cost Standard
In plain termsLeave of absence is a formal system. The parents or another guardian apply, and the school confirms it and reports it to the level above for approval. Each leave lasts at most 1 year; if more leave is needed when it ends, apply again. During the leave, the school must keep the child's enrollment status, and when they return they carry on from there. The specific procedures are set by each province; ask the school's academic affairs office or the local education bureau.
- Cost
- No money. The parents or another legal guardian apply to the school. The hard part is first accepting that the child will stop for a while.
No money
Done in passing
Some willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- Article 16 of the Measures for the Administration of Primary and Secondary School Student Enrollment Status (中小学生学籍管理办法) sets out how leave of absence works. A student's leave of absence is applied for by the parents or another legal guardian. The school confirms it and reports it to the enrollment-management department at the level above for approval. When the student returns, the school should promptly handle the relevant procedures. The period of leave in one application does not exceed 1 year; if, when it expires, the student genuinely needs to continue the leave, they should apply again. During the leave of absence, the school should keep the student's enrollment status (their student identity and place are kept for them). The specific procedures for leave of absence and return are set by the provincial education administration departments (nationwide, issued January 2025). The Ten Measures to Further Strengthen Mental Health Work for Primary and Secondary School Students (进一步加强中小学生心理健康工作十条措施) requires advancing mechanisms for referral to medical care for mental illness and for returning to school after recovery, and guiding schools to draw up contingency plans for handling sudden psychological crises on campus
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- Before you apply, get three things clear: what medical certificate is required, how the enrollment status is recorded in the system during the leave, and whether on return the child goes back to the original grade or drops a grade. It is graded B because the conditions for a leave of absence, the materials to submit and how the return is handled are all set by provincial education departments themselves; at the national level there is only a framework. The Provisions on the School Protection of Minors (未成年人学校保护规定) also require compulsory-education schools to register and file students who drop out, take a leave of absence or take long-term leave, so a leave of absence is something schools have handled before, not a special exception made just for you.
B
If poor vision is found, get cycloplegic refraction at a hospital, then go back for checks at the intervals the doctor gives
Value for cost Standard
In plain termsCycloplegic refraction means first putting in eye drops that relax the muscle in the eye responsible for focusing, then measuring the prescription. It is done at a hospital and is the most accurate way to diagnose myopia. The health commission states that these drops do no harm to healthy eyes, and the eyes return to normal once the drops are stopped. Don't take a single computerized refraction at a glasses shop as a diagnosis, and don't refuse to get your child glasses because you are “afraid the prescription will go up.”
- Cost
- A few tens to a few hundred yuan for the exam and the glasses. After the dilating drops, the child will be sensitive to light and see blurry up close, and it takes half a day to a day or two to wear off.
A little money
Done in passing
No willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- The Ten Key Points on Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents (防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条) explains what cycloplegic refraction is. First a cycloplegic agent is used, then the refraction is measured. A cycloplegic agent is an eye drop that relaxes the muscle in the eye responsible for focusing. Cycloplegic refraction is a medical refraction done at a hospital and is the “gold standard” (the most accurate method) for diagnosing myopia. Dilating drugs do not damage healthy eyes; after use there may be short-term sensitivity to light and unclear near vision, which return to normal once the drug is stopped. Once myopia is diagnosed, there should be timely, scientific intervention, with correction such as wearing glasses. Wearing suitable glasses can effectively correct blurred vision and slow the progression of myopia. For those whose vision is normal with glasses, preschool children and primary school students should be rechecked every 3 to 6 months, and junior and senior high school students every 6 to 12 months, with whether to change glasses decided by the specific situation. Children should have regular refraction screening (measuring the prescription) at 1 to 3 years, 4 to 6 years and after 7 years, to monitor their hyperopia reserve (nationwide, issued July 2023)
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- It is graded B because this is the practice given in an official health-education document, not original research with specific figures. High myopia can lead to problems such as retinal detachment, so follow-up checks are not just for changing glasses. “Poor vision” found in the student health checkup is only a first-screening result; the child still needs a full eye examination at a hospital; see Item 7.
A
Get pit and fissure sealants once the permanent molars come in
Value for cost Standard
In plain termsPit and fissure sealing means sealing the grooves on the chewing surface of the back teeth with resin, so that food debris can't get stuck in them. Two years after sealing, the odds of decay are about one-eighth of those for unsealed teeth. Without sealing, 16% of tooth surfaces decay; with sealing, only about 5%. It still works four years later.
- Cost
- A few tens to one or two hundred yuan per tooth. No anesthetic and no drilling, a few minutes in one visit. Many places have free programs for children of the right age.
A little money
Done in passing
No willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- 38 trials with 7924 children aged 5 to 16, gathered by Cochrane following the rules for a systematic search and counted together. Resin-based sealants were compared with no sealant. For the first permanent molars of children aged 5 to 10, at 24 months after sealing, decay OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.08–0.19): the odds of decay were about one-eighth of those without sealing. This result came from 7 trials, with 1548 randomized and 1322 finally examined, and the quality of evidence is moderate. If 16% of tooth surfaces in the control group decay within 24 months, it is 5.2% (3.13%–7.37%) after sealing. When the control group is at 40%, it is 6.25% (3.84%–9.63%). When the control group is at 70%, it is 19% (12.3%–27.2%). At 48 to 54 months after sealing, OR 0.21 (0.16–0.28), still about one-fifth of no sealing. The authors conclude that at 24 months, resin sealants lead to 11% to 51% less decay than no sealant. In the 4 trials that recorded adverse effects, no adverse effects occurred. Evidence is insufficient on which is better among sealant materials of other types, such as glass ionomer
- Evidence grade
- A
- Notes
- The first permanent molar (the big back tooth that will not be replaced) usually comes in around age 6, and the second around age 12. Sealing should be done while the tooth has just come in and before it has decayed; once it has decayed, it can only be filled. Many areas list pit and fissure sealing for children of the right age as a free program; ask the local CDC (center for disease control) or community health center. This chapter found no national document that could be checked word for word, so it does not give coverage or age ranges. Dental caries is also a focus-of-guidance item in the student health checkup; see Item 7.
B
If your child loves video games, first see whether sleep, homework and getting out for activity are being squeezed out; don't fixate only on how long they played
Value for cost Standard
In plain termsThose who truly meet the bar for “gaming disorder” are about two or three in every hundred. When a questionnaire's cutoff is set low and only adolescents are surveyed, the proportion comes out inflated. Looking at game companies' real records, how much people play has almost nothing to do with how good or bad they feel. Under the rules, minors may play only from 8 to 9 p.m. on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and holidays.
- Cost
- No money. Once a week, take note of what time your child goes to sleep, whether homework has been handed in, and whether they have gone out for activity.
No money
Done in passing
Some willpower
Benefit size small
- Benefit
- A meta-analysis pooled 53 studies from 17 countries with 226247 people. The prevalence of gaming disorder was 3.05% (95% CI 2.38–3.91; this is the confidence interval). Counting only studies with stricter sampling, it was 1.96%. Results varied widely across studies, and 77% of the variation came down to which questionnaire was used. Samples of adolescents, low cutoff scores and small samples all pushed the proportion higher. Another study obtained data from 7 game companies and linked 38935 players' real playing time over six weeks with their own reports of well-being. It found almost no evidence that time spent playing affects well-being. The National Press and Publication Administration provides that game companies may provide 1 hour of service to minors only on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays, from 20:00 to 21:00 each day (nationwide / international, from 2021)
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- It is graded B because the prevalence varies too much with the questionnaire, and the well-being study followed players for only six weeks. The most common cost of gaming is that it crowds out sleep and outdoor time. For the written rules on sleep, see Item 10 of this chapter (sleep, homework, physical activity); for outdoors, see Item 4 of this chapter (2 hours outdoors every day); for screen time, see Item 5 of this chapter (no more than 1 hour a day of non-study use). For top-ups and refunds, see Section 5, Item 9 (children topping up and tipping on a phone). If grades, sleep and relationships with the family all collapse together and persuasion can't stop it, take your child to a psychiatry or child psychology department at that point. Don't send them to a closed-management internet-addiction school; see Item 18 of this chapter (internet-addiction schools). The beneficiary is the child.
- Sources
- Stevens MW, Dorstyn D, Delfabbro PH, King DL. (2021). Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 55(6), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867420962851;Vuorre M, Johannes N, Magnusson K, Przybylski AK. (2022). Time spent playing video games is unlikely to impact well-being. Royal Society Open Science, 9(7), 220411. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220411;国家新闻出版署 (2021). 关于进一步严格管理切实防止未成年人沉迷网络游戏的通知(国新出发〔2021〕14 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-09/01/content_5634661.htm
B
If your child says they like people of the same sex, don't scold them, don't throw them out of the house, don't send them for “conversion”: the family's attitude is linked to whether they will take their own life
Value for cost High
In plain termsAmong secondary school students in China, children who like the same sex or like both sexes are about 3 to 5.5 times as likely as others to have attempted suicide in a year. Studies abroad found that children strongly rejected by their families in adolescence went on to attempt suicide far more often. Those whose parents sent them for “conversion” attempted suicide the most.
- Cost
- No money. The hard part is that parents first have to work through their own emotions and not say harsh things in the moment.
No money
Done in passing
Some willpower
Benefit size large
- Benefit
- A survey in China covered 506 secondary schools in 7 provinces, a total of 150822 students from the first year of junior high to the third year of senior high. The share who had attempted suicide in the past year was, among boys, 2.2% for those attracted only to the opposite sex, 6.9% for those attracted only to the same sex, and 12.2% for those attracted to both. For girls, the corresponding figures were 3.1%, 8.9% and 10.9%. That works out to about 3 to 5.5 times the rate among classmates attracted only to the opposite sex. The researchers adjusted for factors such as age, academic pressure, family finances and being bullied. After that, the ORs for those two groups of boys were 3.13 (95% CI 2.28–4.28) and 3.83 (2.85–5.14), about two to three times higher. A meta-analysis pooling 35 studies found an OR of 3.50 (2.98–4.12) for attempted suicide among sexual-minority adolescents. A US study interviewed 224 gay, lesbian and bisexual young adults aged 21 to 25, asking them to recall how their families reacted during their adolescence. Compared with peers whose families showed almost no rejection, those whose families showed a high degree of rejection had an OR of 8.4 for having attempted suicide. In another study, where parents themselves tried to change their child's sexual orientation, the child's OR for having attempted suicide was 3.08 (1.39–6.83). Where the parents also sent the child to a therapist or a religious figure, it was 5.07 (2.38–10.79) (China / multiple countries / US)
- Evidence grade
- B
- Notes
- It is graded B because these are all one-time surveys, and the degree of family rejection relies on recall in adulthood; they can show only an association, not what causes what. Parents don't have to accept it right away; first, don't do anything that hurts the child. Legally, parents must not abuse or abandon their children, and must not commit domestic violence against them. Frequent verbal abuse and intimidation also count as domestic violence. If your child is low and says they don't want to live, first call 12356, the mental-health hotline; see Section 1, Item 25 (call 12356 when you have suicidal thoughts). You can also go to a psychiatry department following Item 8 of this chapter (screen once for depression at 12 to 18). For why to stay away from “conversion,” see Section 6, Item 28 (don't undergo sexual orientation conversion). The beneficiary is the child, and also yourself.
- Sources
- Huang Y, Li P, Guo L, et al. (2018). Sexual minority status and suicidal behaviour among Chinese adolescents: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 8(8), e020969. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020969;di Giacomo E, Krausz M, Colmegna F, Aspesi F, Clerici M. (2018). Estimating the Risk of Attempted Suicide Among Sexual Minority Youths: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(12), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2731;Ryan C, Huebner D, Diaz RM, Sanchez J. (2009). Family rejection as a predictor of negative health outcomes in white and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults. Pediatrics, 123(1), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-3524;Ryan C, Toomey RB, Diaz RM, Russell ST. (2020). Parent-Initiated Sexual Orientation Change Efforts With LGBT Adolescents: Implications for Young Adult Mental Health and Adjustment. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1538407;全国人大常委会 (2024 年修正). 未成年人保护法(第十七条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081818f197cf001905e567af635a0;全国人大常委会 (2015). 反家庭暴力法(第二条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=2c909fdd678bf17901678bf7f9d60889
A
When disciplining your child, don't hit, and don't yell or call them stupid: children who are often hit and yelled at have more behavioral and emotional problems
Contested Value for cost Standard
In plain termsChildren who are often hit have more aggression and more psychological problems, are more distant from their parents, and more often get hit even harder. Whether hitting makes a child obey on the spot, the evidence can't say. Children who are often yelled at or called stupid at age 13 later get into more trouble and have more depression, and parents' everyday warmth doesn't offset this.
- Cost
- No money. The hard part is stopping your hands and your mouth the moment your temper flares, and also switching to a way of disciplining without hitting or yelling. For what to switch to, see Item 17 of this chapter (parenting classes that teach concrete methods).
No money
Done in passing
Lots of willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- First, hitting. One meta-analysis counted only “spanking with an open hand on the buttocks or on the hands and feet.” It pooled 75 studies and 111 effect sizes, a total of 160927 children. Of 17 outcomes, 13 were clearly associated with being spanked, all in the harmful direction. d is the size of the effect; 0.2 counts as small and 0.5 as medium. Aggression in childhood d = 0.37 (95% CI 0.13–0.61, the confidence interval). Externalizing problems 0.41, meaning things like hitting others and breaking rules. Internalizing problems 0.24, meaning things like anxiety and depression. Mental health problems 0.53, poor relationship with parents 0.51, low self-esteem 0.15, poorer cognitive ability 0.17. Physical abuse by parents 0.64. Antisocial behavior after growing up 0.36, mental health problems 0.24. All 111 effect sizes combined gave d = 0.33 (0.29–0.38). Whether the child obeyed on the spot was not clearly related to being spanked (d = 0.14, −0.19–0.47), and this outcome had only 5 effect sizes. Another review looked only at studies that followed children forward over time, 69 in all. Physical punishment consistently predicted more behavioral problems later on, and was not found to be associated with any good long-term outcome. Of these, 7 studies looked at how often children were hit, and 5 found that the more they were hit, the worse the problems. Next, yelling. A US study followed 976 two-parent families. When the child was 13, if the parents often yelled, swore, or called the child stupid or lazy, the child's misbehavior and depressive symptoms both increased between ages 13 and 14. Whether the parents were usually warm or not, this association was not offset. The reverse also held: children who got into more trouble at 13 were later yelled at more. Legally, parents must not commit domestic violence against their children. Article 2 of the Anti-Domestic Violence Law (反家庭暴力法) lists the forms of domestic violence: beating, binding, maiming, restricting personal freedom, and frequent verbal abuse and intimidation. Article 12 of that law requires guardians to carry out family education in a civilized way. Where parents infringe on a child's rights and interests, the residents' committee or village committee must admonish and stop them, and report serious cases to the public security authorities. If the public security authorities, the procuratorate or the court find out, they should reprimand the parents and may order them to receive family education guidance (nationwide)
- Evidence grade
- A
- Notes
- Contested. Almost all of these studies only tracked and recorded, without randomized groups, so they cannot show what causes what. In the spanking meta-analysis, 72% of the studies only looked at whether two things occurred together, or relied on recall after the fact. Another meta-analysis included only studies that followed children forward over time; after accounting for the child's earlier behavior, the association of spanking with externalizing problems was only 0.07, and with internalizing problems only 0.10. The authors of that one consider the effect very small. Yet another meta-analysis found that “conditional spanking” did better at reducing noncompliance and antisocial behavior than 10 of 13 other discipline methods. It also found that spanking too severely, or relying mainly on spanking, was worse than other methods. So what the opposing side can show is that a small amount of conditional spanking is not necessarily worse than other methods. Hitting hard, and hitting and yelling often, both sides consider worse. An occasional slap or a single yell is not explicitly named as domestic violence in the statute; what it names is beating and frequent verbal abuse and intimidation. The main beneficiary is the child. If someone else in the family hits the child, for calling the police and applying for a protection order see Section 8, Item 43 (personal safety protection order). If you see another family hitting a child over a long period, anyone has the right to step in and dissuade them, or to report it to the public security, civil affairs or education authorities. For what goes on in a stranger's home, calling 110 or telling the residents' committee is enough; don't go to their door and try to break it up yourself.
- Sources
- Gershoff ET, Grogan-Kaylor A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000191;Heilmann A, Mehay A, Watt RG, et al. (2021). Physical punishment and child outcomes: a narrative review of prospective studies. Lancet, 398(10297), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00582-1;Wang MT, Kenny S. (2014). Longitudinal links between fathers' and mothers' harsh verbal discipline and adolescents' conduct problems and depressive symptoms. Child Development, 85(3), 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12143;Ferguson CJ. (2013). Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(1), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.002;Larzelere RE, Kuhn BR. (2005). Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics: a meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-2340-z;全国人大常委会 (2015). 反家庭暴力法(第二、十二条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=2c909fdd678bf17901678bf7f9d60889;全国人大常委会 (2024 年修正). 未成年人保护法(第十一、十七、一百一十八条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081818f197cf001905e567af635a0;全国人大常委会 (2021). 家庭教育促进法(第二十三、五十三条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081817cac3b2d017cac5a6c6f0109
A
If your child is hard to manage and you keep losing control and hitting or yelling, take a course of parenting classes that teach concrete methods
Value for cost Standard
In plain termsIn trials that assigned families by lot, classes that teach parents concrete ways of handling their children reduced children's problems with hitting and breaking rules, and parents' moods improved too. Parents also hit and yelled at their children less: most clearly right after the course, still present a year or two later, but much smaller. Shanghai has also tried this kind of course, and it worked.
- Cost
- The parent schools run by schools, kindergartens and communities are public-interest and charge no fees. The kind of course that has evidence behind it meets once a week or every other week, one to two hours each time, for anywhere from four to twenty-four weeks. You have to practice at home as taught. The hard part is sticking it out to the end and practicing every day.
No money
A few hours
Some willpower
Benefit size medium
- Benefit
- Cochrane pooled 13 trials, 10 of them randomized, with a total of 1078 parents. The children were 3 to 12 years old, all with behavioral problems. Parents who took the course had children with fewer behavioral problems. Rated by the parents themselves, SMD −0.53 (95% CI −0.72 to −0.34, the confidence interval); rated independently by others, −0.44 (−0.77 to −0.11). SMD and d are the same yardstick; 0.5 counts as medium. Parents' mental health improved, −0.36 (−0.52 to −0.20). Negative or harsh discipline decreased: rated by the parents themselves, −0.77 (−0.96 to −0.59); rated by others, −0.42 (−0.67 to −0.16). The authors say these are short-term effects. Another meta-analysis identified 346 randomized trials, of which 60 measured behavior such as hitting and yelling at children, spread across 22 countries. Hitting and yelling decreased right after the course, d = −0.46 (−0.59 to −0.33). At 1 to 6 months later it was −0.24 (−0.37 to −0.11). At 7 to 24 months later it was −0.18 (−0.34 to −0.02), shrinking the further out it went. Most of these data were reported by the parents themselves. There are trials in China too. In Shanghai, 81 parents were randomized, and some of them took Triple P group classes. After the course, the children's adjustment problems and the parents' discipline and moods were all better than among parents waiting for the course, and this was still present 6 months later. At a rural kindergarten, 191 adults caring for children took part; some of them studied an online course on their own, plus two group discussions. Two weeks after finishing, the child-maltreatment behaviors they reported were about 33% fewer than among those only given a book to read (IRR 0.67). Three months later, the children also had fewer behavioral problems (d = −0.40). The Family Education Promotion Law (家庭教育促进法) requires parents to make a conscious effort to learn about family education. Primary and secondary schools and kindergartens may run parent schools and regularly organize public-interest family education guidance. Residents' committees and village committees may run community parent schools. Governments at the provincial level and above must set up public-interest online parent schools and service hotlines. Family education guidance institutions must not organize for-profit training (nationwide, in effect from January 1, 2022)
- Evidence grade
- A
- Notes
- It is graded A because there are figures pooled by Cochrane and from multiple randomized trials. The courses in the trials had several things in common. The person leading the course taught concrete methods, such as playing with the child, praise, rewards and discipline. Parents practiced and rehearsed in class, and had homework to do at home. Courses that only handed out materials or only held discussions were excluded, so the evidence does not extend to the kind that is just a single lecture. What public-interest parent schools in China teach, and how they teach it, varies by locality, and they may not be this kind. When choosing a course, look at whether it runs for several weeks in a row and has you practice concrete methods. Course names you will often see include Triple P, Incredible Years and Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). This book does not recommend specific organizations or paid products. The reduction in hitting and yelling gets smaller after a year or two, so you have to keep practicing after the course ends. The beneficiary is the child, and also yourself. If your child already has serious emotional problems, take them to a psychiatry or child psychology department; see Item 8 of this chapter (depression screening).
- Sources
- Furlong M, McGilloway S, Bywater T, Hutchings J, Smith SM, Donnelly M. (2012). Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD008225. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008225.pub2;Backhaus S, Leijten P, Jochim J, Melendez-Torres GJ, Gardner F. (2023). Effects over time of parenting interventions to reduce physical and emotional violence against children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine, 60, 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102003;Guo M, Morawska A, Sanders MR. (2016). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Triple P With Chinese Parents in Mainland China. Behavior Modification, 40(6), 825–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516644221;Wang W, Zhang H. (2026). A self-directed parenting program to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in rural China: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 173, 107937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2026.107937;全国人大常委会 (2021). 家庭教育促进法(第十八、二十五、三十一、三十八、四十条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081817cac3b2d017cac5a6c6f0109
C
Don't send your child to a closed-management “internet-addiction school” or “boot camp”: the law prohibits treating internet addiction by means that harm body and mind, and children have already died from being locked up
Value for cost High
In plain termsThe law expressly prohibits treating internet addiction by means that harm a child's body and mind. A special-training school in Hefei handcuffed a boy who had just been sent there in a confinement room, and about 44 hours later he was dead. Yuzhang Academy in Nanchang locked students in solitary confinement; several of the people in charge were sentenced, and when parents asked for their tuition back, the court did not support it.
- Cost
- No money, and you save a sum in tuition. The hard part is that when the child is acting out at their worst, the parent has to hold back from handing them over to outsiders for “closed-management discipline.”
No money
Done in passing
Some willpower
Benefit size large
- Benefit
- Article 68 of the Law on the Protection of Minors (未成年人保护法) provides that no organization or individual may intervene in a minor's internet addiction by means that infringe on the minor's physical and mental health. Both of the cases below have court judgments. The first was in Hefei, Anhui. In August 2017, the parents of an 18-year-old boy signed an agreement with a special-training school to send him there to break his internet addiction. People from the school took him away by force, locked him in a confinement room, and handcuffed both his hands to the window bars. They restricted his food, water and rest, and also beat him. About 44 hours later, the boy died. The forensic conclusion was death from a water and electrolyte imbalance caused by high temperature, restricted body position, lack of food and drink, and external injuries. On October 31, 2018, the Hefei Intermediate Court delivered its first-instance judgment. The school's head was convicted of intentional injury and unlawful detention and sentenced to 16 years. Four instructors were sentenced to between 1 year and 8 years 6 months. On December 28, 2018, the Anhui High Court, on second instance, upheld the original judgment. The second-instance ruling states that this school had not been approved by the relevant authorities, and that none of the defendants had teaching qualifications. The second was in Nanchang, Jiangxi. Yuzhang Academy opened in 2013 and was deregistered and shut down in November 2017. While it operated, the school took some students into a “boredom-relief room” and locked them in solitary confinement under a dedicated guard, for three to ten days each time. On April 28, 2023, the Anyuan District Court of Pingxiang announced its first-instance verdict in the retrial: the five defendants were guilty of unlawful detention. Four were sentenced to between two years ten months and eleven months, and barred from education-related occupations for a set period; one was exempted from criminal punishment. The parents' claims for tuition and round-trip travel costs were not supported by the court (nationwide / Anhui / Jiangxi)
- Evidence grade
- C
- Notes
- It is graded C because there are only individual cases and no statistics on how often such schools have incidents. For the Hefei case there are media reports only; the reports cite the first-instance judgment and the second-instance ruling, and the original judgment was not found on court websites. The Yuzhang Academy case is a court verdict reported by Xinhua. If your child loves video games, first follow Item 14 of this chapter (a child who loves video games) and see whether sleep, homework and getting out for activity are being squeezed out. If grades, sleep and family relationships have all collapsed together and persuasion can't stop it, take your child to a psychiatry or child psychology department, where a doctor diagnoses and then treats. If your child has already been sent to one, bring them home. If your child says they were locked up or beaten, report it to the police. The beneficiary is the child.