Photo: 中德 E座 实训车间.jpg by Neil8472, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Cropped and colour-muted for display.
Section 23·23 items·9 October 2026
Which Skills Are Worth Learning
school or work (the age line for child labor, education and mortality, the nation's education structure, tuition waivers, grants and student loans, routes from secondary vocational school to further study, how to run the numbers yourself), returns to education, knockoff certificates, training subsidies, which abilities are hard for machines to replace, skill levels, how to check occupations in short supply, and, once you've decided what to learn, how to learn it (self-testing, spaced practice, don't rely on highlighting, interleaved practice, learning styles have no evidence), and finally professional titles (application channels, exams in place of evaluation, the consequences of fraudulent evaluation through agents, being awarded a title doesn't mean being appointed to it). Outcome type: money/time, with one item on mortality.
A 17B 4C 2
Lifespan 1Time and energy 8Money 12Personal freedom 22 contested
This section counts money and time; Item 2 separately counts mortality. The first six items answer one question: whether to keep studying. Item 1 first covers which part of the options the law rules out, Item 2 counts the relationship between schooling and lifespan, and Item 3 looks at which education levels people across the country are at. Item 4 covers what financial aid there is when you can't afford school, Item 5 covers what paths remain if you didn't get into a regular senior high school, and Item 6 turns “school or work” into one calculation and gives a method for working it out yourself. The next seven items answer another question: once you decide to learn something, how to choose. China's wage statistics broken down by type of job are hard to verify item by item through public official channels. So only a few things with traceable sources are written here: roughly how much more you earn per extra year of schooling (also called the rate of return to education), how to verify whether a certificate is legitimate, where training subsidies come from, and which dimension to look at when choosing a skill so it is less easily replaced. This guide gives no figure for how much a specific type of job earns per month. Items 14 to 19 answer a third question: once you have decided what to learn, how to learn it in less time. These six items count time and are not converted into money. Items 20 to 23 answer a fourth question: if you already do professional or technical work, where to apply for a professional title, how to take the exams, which traps to avoid, and what the title is worth once you get it.
The items in this section are grouped by topic below; the numbers in parentheses are item numbers.
Whether to keep studying: no going out to work under 16 (Item 1), whether schooling is worth it counted in mortality (Item 2), the national education structure (Item 3), if you can't afford school, first run the numbers by policy (Item 4), paths if you didn't get into regular senior high school (Item 5), school or work turned into one calculation (Item 6).
How to choose what to learn: the return on one more year of education (Item 7), check the occupational qualification catalogue before taking a certificate exam (Item 8), take training through government-subsidized channels (Item 9), choose skills that need hands-on work and on-site judgment (Item 10), check whether a skill has level assessment (Item 11), check the local list of occupations in short supply (Item 12), choose short programs that lead straight to a job (Item 13).
How to learn in less time: after studying, close the book and test yourself (Item 14), spread the time over several days (Item 15), don't make highlighting your main way of studying (Item 16), practice several problem types mixed together (Item 17), don't choose study methods by visual or auditory type (Item 18), for material you must memorize, make up questions and test yourself (Item 19).
Professional titles: find the application channel for a professional title (Item 20), junior and intermediate accounting titles come through a unified national exam (Item 21), don't use agents who get titles evaluated for you (Item 22), getting a title does not mean a pay rise (Item 23).
Sources are reproduced exactly as they appear in the Chinese original, including Chinese titles of laws and quoted statutory text. Original Chinese text of this section at upstream commit bb25081, on GitHub.
Under 16, “going out to work” is not an option: an employer that hires you is fined 5000 yuan a month, and anyone willing to hire you is offering illegal, off-the-books work
Value for cost Very high
In plain terms
People usually finish junior high school at 15 to 16, right on this line. If you are under 16, an employer that hires you is breaking the law, and it is fined 5000 yuan a month for each child laborer it uses. So anyone willing to take you on is an employer that knows it is breaking the law and dares to use you anyway. If something really goes wrong, medical costs and compensation can only be claimed from that employer; if it refuses to pay or runs off, no one else will pay in its place.
Cost
No money. Spend one minute working out how old you are.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size large
Benefit
The Compulsory Education Law (义务教育法), Article 11: “The parents or other legal guardians of every child who has reached the age of six shall send the child to school to receive and complete compulsory education.” Article 14: “Employers are prohibited from recruiting school-age children and adolescents who should be receiving compulsory education.” Article 58: where, without a valid reason, school-age children and adolescents are not sent to school as this law requires, the local township people's government or the county-level people's government's education administrative department “shall give criticism and education and order correction within a time limit.” The Provisions on the Prohibition of Using Child Labor (禁止使用童工规定), Article 2: state organs, social organizations, enterprises and public institutions, private non-enterprise units or individual businesses: “none may recruit minors under 16 years of age.” Article 6: “a penalty shall be imposed at the standard of a fine of 5000 yuan per month for each child laborer used”; if not corrected by the deadline, the fine is 10,000 yuan per person per month. Article 7: anyone who introduces a child laborer into employment “shall be fined 5000 yuan for each person introduced.” Article 10: if a child laborer falls ill or is injured, the employer “shall be responsible for sending them to a medical institution for treatment and shall bear all medical and living expenses during the treatment period,” and in case of disability or death must also pay one-off compensation. Article 13 leaves only one exception: arts and sports organizations may, with the consent of the parents or other guardians, recruit professional performers and athletes under 16 (nationwide)
Evidence grade
A
Notes
The beneficiary is you. Working once you have turned 16 is legal. But the jobs willing to take a 16-year-old with no qualifications are exactly the kind that Item 10 of this section (choose skills that resist automation) describes: fixed routines, the easiest to be replaced by machines. The overtime pay, annual leave and work-injury benefits covered in Section 19 all presuppose an employment relationship and evidence. Illegal off-the-books work has neither, so that money cannot be claimed either
Put “is schooling worth it” into the mortality ledger too: each extra year of education lowers adult risk of death by about 1.9%
ContestedValue for cost Standard
In plain terms
Each extra year of schooling lowers your risk of death in adulthood by about 1.9% on average. The effect is clearest for people aged 18 to 49, about 2.9% lower per extra year; for those over 70 it is only 0.8% lower. People who manage to stay in school tend to be better off to begin with, and how much of this is the effect of schooling itself cannot be told apart.
Cost
No money. What it costs is the time and effort of those extra years of schooling; for tuition, see Item 4 of this section (secondary vocational tuition and grants). The hard part is staying in school all the way through without giving up partway.
No moneyTime every dayLots of willpowerBenefit size small
Benefit
Earlier studies were gathered and pooled into one calculation (a systematic review and meta-analysis). The search covered January 1980 to May 2023, and the final analysis included 603 studies, 70 locations in 59 countries, and 10355 observations. Education and adult mortality (deaths from all causes added together) have a dose-response relationship (the more schooling, the larger the drop). Each extra year of education lowers the risk of death by 1.9% on average (95% uncertainty interval 1.8–2.0; the true value roughly falls within this range). For people aged 18 to 49, each extra year lowers it by 2.9% (2.8–3.0). For people over 70, by 0.8% (0.6–1.0). No difference was seen between men and women. Broken down by a country's level of development (socio-demographic index), no difference was seen either
Evidence grade
A (contested)
Notes
Contested. The authors themselves reported publication bias (p<0.0001), meaning studies with good-looking results are more likely to get published. Results also differ widely between studies. All the included studies followed people and observed them; none were trials that divided people into groups. Years of schooling are tangled up with family circumstances, region and occupation; how much of this 1.9% comes from schooling itself and how much from “people who manage to stay in school were better off to begin with” is something this kind of study cannot separate. Nor can it separate the reverse path: people who have illnesses or psychological problems from childhood are more likely to drop out and also more likely to die early, which makes schooling's effect look bigger than it really is. So it is strong support for “more schooling and a longer life go in the same direction,” but that does not equal “if you go to school you will extend your life by 1.9%.” The benefit size is rated small: what a reader usually faces is three or four more years of schooling, and at 1.9% per year that adds up to less than a tenth, which by the thresholds used throughout this guide counts only as small. The beneficiary is you
Sources
IHME-CHAIN Collaborators (2024). Effects of education on adult mortality: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 9(3), e155-e165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00306-7
Before deciding whether “degrees have lost their value,” first look at the nation's education structure: only 15467 in every 100,000 people have a university-level education (2020 census; about 19% by the 2025 sample-survey estimate)
Value for cost High
In plain terms
At the 2020 population census, about 15% of people nationwide had reached junior college or above. The 2025 sample survey estimates about 19%, a few percentage points more over five years. Both times, people with a junior high education were the largest group. People aged 15 and over had on average only 9.91 years of schooling, just past finishing junior high. So in China a junior high education is not “good enough”; it is the most ordinary tier.
Cost
No money. Just take a look at the numbers below.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
The standard reference time of the Seventh National Population Census was November 1, 2020. Of the national population, 218360767 people had a university-level education (junior college and above). 213005258 had senior high school (including secondary specialized school). 487163489 had junior high school. 349658828 had primary school. Compared with the Sixth National Population Census in 2010, the number per 100,000 people with a university-level education rose from 8930 to 15467. Senior high school rose from 14032 to 15088. Junior high school fell from 38788 to 34507. Primary school fell from 26779 to 24767. Average years of schooling for people aged 15 and over rose from 9.08 years to 9.91 years. The illiteracy rate fell from 4.08% to 2.67%. The standard reference time of the 2025 national 1% population sample survey was November 1, 2025, with a sample of 20,520,000 people. Estimated from the sample, the national population is 1,405,450,000. Of these, 272,330,000 had a university-level education (junior college and above), 242,720,000 senior high school (including secondary specialized school), 452,830,000 junior high school, and 331,220,000 primary school. The communiqué does not give per-100,000 figures. Converted here against the total population, university level is about 19.4% and junior high about 32.2%, still the largest tier
Evidence grade
A
Notes
These numbers only show how scarce a level of education is in the population. Whether schooling pays off for a particular person has to be worked out yourself with the method in Item 6 of this section (how to count school against work). Also note: the census counts the entire national population, old people and children included. The share of young people who reached university is much higher than this figure, so comparing yourself with your peers using it will overstate your advantage. Conversely, using it to rebut “schooling is useless” does hold, because the denominator is exactly the whole labor force that will compete with you for jobs. The 2025 figures are estimated from a sample, while the census counts everyone household by household; the two are measured differently, so the two sets of figures are shown side by side and the new figures do not replace the old. 19.4% and 32.2% were calculated here from the communiqué's head counts and the total population. The beneficiary is you
If you “can't afford school,” first run the numbers by policy: secondary vocational tuition is mostly waived already, the grant is 2300 yuan, and student loans go up to 20,000 a year
Value for cost Very high
In plain terms
At public secondary vocational schools, rural students, urban students in agriculture-related majors and students from families in financial difficulty already pay no tuition. The grant for secondary vocational and regular senior high school students has been 2300 yuan a year since spring 2025. At university, the grant is 3700 yuan a year, and you can borrow at most 20,000 a year in student loans. If money is short you can postpone or try another way; it rarely comes to having to drop out now to go to work.
Cost
No money. Before term starts, ask the school's student financial aid office once and hand in the paperwork once.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size large
Benefit
Tuition waivers for secondary vocational school have been policy since the autumn semester of 2012. The original text reads: “waive tuition for all rural (including county-town) students, urban students in agriculture-related majors and students from families in financial difficulty among full-time, formally enrolled first-, second- and third-year students at public secondary vocational schools (excluding students in arts-related performance majors).” Student financial aid policy was adjusted in 2024. The national grant for undergraduate and junior college students rose from 3300 to 3700 yuan per student per year. The national encouragement scholarship rose from 5000 to 6000 yuan. These two took effect from the autumn semester of 2024 (the encouragement scholarship from 2024). The national grants for secondary vocational schools and for regular senior high schools both rose from 2000 to 2300 yuan per student per year, effective from the spring semester of 2025. National student loans were also adjusted, from the autumn semester of 2024. For undergraduate and junior college students, “the annual loan amount each person can apply for is raised from no more than 16000 yuan to no more than 20000 yuan.” For graduate students, “from no more than 20000 yuan to no more than 25000 yuan.” The interest rate is the loan prime rate (LPR) of the same term and tier minus 70 basis points (that is, 0.7 percentage points lower) (nationwide)
Evidence grade
A
Notes
The beneficiaries are you and your children. Exactly who the tuition waiver covers and how many tiers the grant has are set by each province. Private schools are subsidized at the standard for the same majors at local public schools, and you still pay the difference yourself, so check against your local documents before enrolling. A student loan is a loan, not a subsidy, and must be repaid after graduation. But it splits “I can't come up with the tuition now” and “are these years worth it” into two separate matters, so don't treat a shortage of money as the conclusion yet. Section 7 covers training subsidies during unemployment and temporary assistance; if your family's income has really stopped, apply for those first
Not getting into a regular senior high school does not mean the road ends: secondary vocational schools have through-track enrollment and separate exams, and hiring for skilled posts can lower education requirements
Value for cost High
In plain terms
The 2022 Vocational Education Law states that vocational education and general education have equally important status. Secondary vocational schools can run through-track enrollment with higher vocational colleges, and higher vocational colleges must also set aside enrollment quotas or hold separate exams specifically to admit secondary vocational graduates. Employers also may not set thresholds that block you because you graduated from a vocational school. Not scoring enough for regular senior high school means switching to another path, not stopping at a junior high education.
Cost
No money. Before filling in your senior high school entrance exam (中考) choices, check your province's vocational education enrollment platform once.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
The Vocational Education Law (职业教育法) (in force from May 1, 2022), Article 3: “Vocational education is a type of education with equally important status as general education.” Article 37: secondary vocational schools “may, in accordance with relevant state provisions, carry out through-track enrollment and training with higher vocational school education in relevant majors.” Higher vocational schools “may, in accordance with relevant state provisions, admit students through assessment methods that combine general academic quality with vocational skills.” Education administrative departments at the provincial level and above must set up a unified vocational education enrollment platform that compiles and publishes information on schools, majors offered and enrollment, and provides query and application services. Article 53: “Vocational school students enjoy equal opportunities with students of general schools at the same level in further education, employment, career development and other respects.” Higher vocational schools and regular higher education institutions that offer vocational education “shall set a corresponding proportion in their enrollment plans or adopt separate examinations to specifically admit vocational school graduates.” “Employers shall not set application, recruitment or hiring conditions that hinder vocational school graduates' equal employment and fair competition.” In open recruitment by public institutions, posts with vocational skill level requirements “may appropriately lower the educational requirements” (nationwide)
Evidence grade
A
Notes
The beneficiaries are you and your children. These are statutory channels, not guaranteed admission. Which majors have through-track training, what proportion is reserved for separate enrollment and which subjects the vocational college entrance exam covers are all set by each province. Before filling in your choices you must check your province's vocational education enrollment platform and enrollment plan for that year; don't reason from other provinces' experience. When choosing a secondary vocational major, run it through the dimension in Item 10 of this section (choose skills that resist automation): majors that require being on site in non-standard environments are harder to replace. When choosing a school, just check whether it is in your province's vocational education enrollment plan for that year. Then verify the certificates it issues with the three steps in Item 8 (check whether the certificate is in the catalogue). Reject outright any enrollment pitch that promises “guaranteed job placement” or “guaranteed pass”
Turn “school or work” into one calculation: three years of earlier wages, set against decades of annual income gap afterward
Value for cost High
In plain terms
Lay the two choices out on paper and compare them. Starting work early earns you three years of wages from low-barrier jobs, and only this once. Continuing school buys you the extra slice you earn every year afterward, multiplied by the thirty or forty years you have left. In urban China, each extra year of schooling raises income by 4.0% (1988) to 10.2% (2001) on average. The data are old, so this only gives a rough idea.
Cost
No money. Sit down and work it out once, about half an hour.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
This is an estimate for urban China from 1988 to 2001. How much higher your income is for each extra year of schooling is called the rate of return to education. The original text says it “rose sharply from 4.0% per year of schooling in 1988 to 10.2% in 2001.” Most of the rise came after 1992. It reflects the growing slice that people who reached university earn over those who did not (the wage premium for higher education). This is a home-grown Chinese order of magnitude you can use when converting “one more year of school” into an annual income gap. For the global average, see Item 7 of this section (the global average return on one more year of education)
Evidence grade
B
Notes
Before calculating, first subtract the tuition waivers and grants in Item 4 of this section (secondary vocational tuition and grants); there is also the separate ledger in Item 2 of this section (one more year of education and mortality). The data end in 2001 and cover only urban areas, so they cannot be used directly as today's figures. The same goes for the global average of 9% in Item 7 of this section. If you really calculate this way, the conclusion will differ from person to person. With high tuition, a major that does not match the jobs, and many years of study, the result may genuinely come out not worth it, but that only shows this specific program is not worth it; it does not show that schooling is useless. Several things cannot go into the formula: legal education thresholds, see Item 5 of this section (through-track enrollment and separate exams for secondary vocational schools); resistance to replacement, see Item 10 (choose skills that resist automation); and whether you can switch industries. The beneficiary is you
Sources
Zhang J, Zhao Y, Park A, Song X (2005). Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988 to 2001. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 730-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2005.05.008
First memorize the baseline: one more year of education brings a global average private return (the part that lands on your own income) of about 9% a year
Value for cost Very high
In plain terms
Averaged across the whole world, one more year of schooling raises personal income by about 9% a year, and women's return has consistently been higher than men's. This number is about formal schooling; it cannot be applied directly to signing up for a course. Use it as a ruler: if a course asks you to spend 30,000 yuan and half a year, ask whether the change in income it brings matches one more year of schooling.
Cost
No money. Memorize this number and use it as a ruler for every “learn something” plan.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size large
Benefit
A review covering 1950 to 2014, 139 countries and 1120 estimates calculated: “the global average private rate of return to one more year of schooling is 9% a year.” The private return is the part that lands on the person's own income: with one more year of schooling, income is about 9% higher on average. Private returns to higher education are rising. The social return to education (the part that lands on society as a whole rather than on the individual) is still high. The average return to women's education is consistently higher than men's
Evidence grade
A
Notes
This is the global average for “one more year of schooling”; it cannot be treated as the return on “signing up for a course,” nor is it a specific figure for China; it serves only as an order-of-magnitude reference. Its use is to give every training plan a ruler: if a course asks you to spend 30,000 yuan and half a year, you should ask whether it can bring a change in income equivalent to one year of formal education. Also note that the global average masks huge differences between fields of study and between countries
Before paying for a certificate exam, first check whether the certificate is in the national occupational qualification catalogue or on the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security's list of registered assessment bodies
Value for cost High
In plain terms
Some organizations use the names “new occupation” or “skill level” to run classes at will, charge arbitrary fees and hand out certificates indiscriminately, and some pose as authoritative bodies; the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security ran a dedicated crackdown on this. Before signing up, check in three steps: whether the occupation is in the national occupational qualification catalogue, whether the issuing body is an assessment body registered with the human resources and social security authorities, and whether the certificate number can be found on the official platform. If it can't be found, the registration fee is money thrown away.
Cost
No money. Check once, ten-odd minutes.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security has run a nationwide crackdown specifically on this. The disorder named in the document is: “some organizations and units arbitrarily hold training, assessment and certification activities in the name of new-occupation professional qualifications, vocational skill levels and the like, charging arbitrary fees and issuing certificates indiscriminately; some organizations and units engage in false or exaggerated publicity, and even organize training and assessment and issue certificates in the name of authoritative bodies they impersonate.” The measures include joint investigation with the cyberspace, public security and market regulation departments, and “severely cracking down on assessment and certification activities that impersonate appraisal institutions or assessment bodies registered with human resources and social security departments.” Non-compliant publicity on websites and new media is shut down according to law. The document also requires “guiding the public to understand the channels and methods for checking certificates, so as to judge a certificate's legality, compliance and real worth”
Evidence grade
A
Notes
Verify in this order. First see whether the occupation is in the National Catalogue of Occupational Qualifications (国家职业资格目录); anything not in the catalogue is not a national occupational qualification. Then see whether the issuing body is an assessment body registered with the human resources and social security authorities. Finally, go to the official skilled-talent assessment certificate lookup platform and check whether the certificate number can be found. If it can't be found, don't sign up, no exceptions. Those carrying the words “international,” “advanced” or “registered,” or promising “guaranteed pass” or “income from lending your certificate to a company,” carry the highest risk
Take training through government-subsidized channels first; don't jump straight into paying for a commercial course yourself
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
From 2025 to the end of 2027, the state plans subsidized training for 30 million person-times or more. The money comes from several pots, including employment subsidy funds, the unemployment insurance fund and enterprise employee education funds. The more short-staffed a type of job is and the higher its training cost, the higher the subsidy. If you have a job, ask your employer first; everyone else should first go through the local human resources and social security bureau's subsidy catalogue, then decide what to learn.
Cost
No money, or the cost is heavily reduced. The training itself takes up time. The hard part is resisting the impulse to sign up and pay for a course yourself, and going through the subsidy catalogue first.
No moneyA few hoursSome willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
The national-level scale is clear: from 2025 to the end of 2027, “carry out subsidized training for 30 million person-times or more, focused on high-end, precision and cutting-edge industries and urgently needed sectors, key employment groups and others.” Funding sources are pooled into one package: employment subsidy funds, the unemployment insurance fund, industry development funds, east-west cooperation funds, enterprise employee education funds and others. How high the subsidy is depends on how urgently needed and scarce an occupation (type of job) is and on its training cost, and it differs between types of job. Enterprises are also required to “set aside and use employee education funds in full as required, ensuring that 60% or more goes to the education and training of frontline employees”
Evidence grade
A
Notes
How exactly to claim it and how much you can get are set by each province. The entry points are the “vocational training subsidy catalogue” on the local human resources and social security bureau's official website, and public training bases. Section 7 covers vocational training subsidies during unemployment (the same person can receive them at most 3 times) and social insurance subsidies. People with a job should instead first ask their employer about its employee education funds. Checking the subsidy catalogue before choosing what to learn saves far more money than choosing first and then looking for a subsidy
When choosing a skill, look first at “does it need hands-on work, does it need on-site judgment”: these are the hardest for automation to replace
ContestedValue for cost Very high
In plain terms
By an estimate for the United States, about 47% of jobs are at relatively high risk of being taken over by computers; later estimates made task by task put the share much lower. Machines have three hurdles that are hard to clear: manual dexterity, coming up with new things, and dealing with people. So work that requires being on site, in non-standard environments, with judgment on the spot is harder to replace, and jobs with fixed routines that mainly process information carry the highest risk.
Cost
No money. Before choosing, run the work you want to learn through this dimension.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size large
Benefit
The study estimated, one by one for 702 occupations in the United States, “how likely this work is to be handed over to a computer” (an assessment of the probability of computerisation), and found that about 47% of employment is in the high-risk range. What decides high or low risk in the model are three hurdles that machines currently cannot get past, which the authors call “engineering bottlenecks.” The first is perception and manipulation, including finger dexterity, manual dexterity, and working in cramped spaces and awkward positions. The second is creative intelligence (the ability to come up with new things). The third is social intelligence (the ability to deal with people). So work in non-standard environments that needs skilled hands and on-the-spot judgment consistently has a lower probability of being replaced; this is not a chance result for a few occupations. Jobs with fixed routines that mainly process information carry the highest risk
Evidence grade
B
Notes
Contested. This study is a 2013 paper draft that was never formally published, and what it scored was “whether a whole occupation can be taken over by machines.” Later studies instead broke the estimate down to individual specific tasks and found a much lower high-risk share. Nor does it say in which year this would happen. When using it, don't fixate on the 47% figure; look at the three places it points out where machines get stuck. Work such as on-site installation, repair and maintenance, and nursing care resists replacement better than pure clerical work, and that is why. So when you “learn a skill,” you should prefer the kind that requires being on site and facing non-standard environments
Sources
Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Before learning a skill, first confirm whether it has level assessment and whether the level can be turned into money
Value for cost High
In plain terms
The state is promoting the “new eight-level worker” (新八级工) system, requiring enterprises to link post wages to skill levels, and outstanding employees can also be certified at a level directly, without regard to length of service or seniority. This is a policy direction, and it varies a lot between places and between enterprises. Only a skill with a national occupational standard and a level pathway gives you any prospect of raises by level later on, so check whether it has one before you learn it.
Cost
No money. Checking once is enough.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
The state is promoting the “new eight-level worker” vocational skill level system. The document explicitly requires linking levels to pay; its wording is: “strengthen a skills-oriented pay distribution system... guide enterprises to implement a distribution method that links post pay to both the value of the post and the skill level.” Localities are to “step up the intensity and the number of rounds of evaluation and appointment at senior-worker level and above.” Qualifying enterprises may conduct skill level assessment for their own employees themselves. For outstanding employees, “conditions such as years of service, level and seniority may be broken through to directly certify the corresponding vocational skill level”
Evidence grade
B
Notes
This is a policy direction, not wage figures that have already been delivered, and how far it is implemented varies greatly between places and between enterprises. The part you can act on: when choosing a skill, see whether it has a corresponding national occupational standard and a level pathway; only a skill with a pathway gives you any prospect of raises by level later. With a “skill” that has no levels and no industry entry threshold either, once you have learned it you can only rely on yourself to find work
Don't take “people online say the pay is high” as a sign of a labor shortage; check the local list of occupations in short supply and the subsidy catalogue
Value for cost High
In plain terms
Which types of job get more training subsidy in a given place is set by how urgently needed and scarce they are and by training cost, so the subsidy amounts show whether that place is short of workers. The “such-and-such job makes so much a month” you see online is mostly an advertised rate on a recruitment platform or someone's own account. What you get to see is mostly the people who made money, and it doesn't count working hours, commuting, occupational disease or busy and slow seasons.
Cost
No money. Look up two local documents.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
The subsidy amount itself is the official pricing of “which types of job are short of workers.” The policy requires “improving a differentiated subsidy mechanism determined by the urgency and scarcity of the occupation (type of job), training cost and other factors,” and each locality uses it to set the scope of its own subsidized vocational skill training programs. So how much the subsidy for the same type of job differs between cities directly reflects how scarce it is locally
Evidence grade
C
Notes
Official wage figures by occupation only go down to five broad categories of post, with no specific types of job. The National Bureau of Statistics' 2025 figures are: the average annual wage at enterprises above designated size is about 106,000 yuan (exact value 106080 yuan). Mid-level and above managers about 210,000 yuan (exact value 210016 yuan), professional and technical staff about 155,000 yuan (exact value 155491 yuan), clerical staff 94936 yuan, production and manufacturing staff 80739 yuan, social production and everyday service staff 79857 yuan. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security's “ranking of the 100 occupations most short of workers” can be looked up on China Employment Network (中国就业网); the latest edition stops at the fourth quarter of 2022 and is compiled from the recruitment and job-seeking data of public employment service agencies in 102 cities nationwide. The “such-and-such job makes so much a month” circulating online almost all comes from advertised rates on recruitment platforms or people's own accounts. The ones you get to see are mostly the batch who made money, and none of it counts working hours, commuting, occupational disease or busy and slow seasons. To see real demand, go to the local human resources and social security bureau's official website and check the subsidy catalogue, then check the job-demand rankings of public employment service agencies. Finally, go to actual construction sites, factories and shops and ask the people working there
For the same money and time, prefer short programs that lead straight to a job
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
What the policy encourages is “short, quick and fast” training that can lead to employment in the short term, plus micro-majors at vocational colleges. When choosing a program, look at only one thing: once you finish, is there a specific job you can send a résumé to. For programs that take half a year to a year and, at completion, still require you to “gain more experience,” the time you actually spend far exceeds the listed price. Write down your exit condition before you start: how far you will have learned, still without finding work, when you stop.
Cost
You pay tuition for a short course, not much money. It takes up a stretch of time. The hard part is stopping on the conditions you agreed in advance when you are halfway through and it hasn't paid off yet.
A little moneyA few hoursSome willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
The policy line is consistent with this: it supports “private training institutions in running market-based, high-quality vocational skill training programs and ‘short, quick and fast’ vocational skill training programs that can achieve employment in the short term.” It also pushes vocational colleges to “focus on knowledge and skills urgently needed in the job market... and open micro-majors and vocational competence training courses”
Evidence grade
C
Notes
There is just one criterion: once you finish, is there a specific job you can send a résumé to. Programs that take half a year to a year and, after completion, still require you to “gain more experience” actually cost far more than their listed price. The exit conditions covered in Section 4 apply here too: before you start, write down clearly “how far I will have learned, still without finding work, when I stop”
After studying, first close the book and test yourself once; don't go back and reread
Value for cost High
In plain terms
Reading something again after you've just read it feels very familiar, but it doesn't actually stick. Closing the book and testing yourself works clearly better; adding quizzes in class raised grades by a medium amount. In a ranking of ten common study methods, self-testing was in the top tier. After finishing a section, write out the key points from memory first, then flip back and check.
Cost
No money, and no increase in total time either. Use the time you would have spent rereading to write things out from memory with the book closed or to do practice questions instead. The hard part is that self-testing exposes on the spot what you haven't remembered, which feels worse than rereading.
No moneyDone in passingSome willpowerBenefit size large
Benefit
A meta-analysis of 222 independent studies and 48478 students: classroom quizzes raised students' academic performance, with a medium effect size (g = 0.499). How large the effect is depends on several conditions: what study method the control group used, whether the quiz format matched the final exam, whether the materials matched, whether corrective feedback was given, how many times the quiz was repeated, where and when the testing took place, how long the intervention lasted, and what experimental design was used. Another review, which evaluated ten common study methods one by one, rated “practice testing” and “distributed practice” in the top tier (high utility), on the grounds that they work for learners of different ages and abilities and have been validated across many forms of assessment and in real educational settings.
Evidence grade
A
Notes
Self-testing is about forcing yourself to pull things out of your head, not about getting a score. How to do it: after finishing a section, close the book and write out the key points from memory first, then flip back and check. It works better with corrective feedback, so after checking the answers, look carefully at where you went wrong. The benefit size is recorded as “large,” judged by the effect size and the rating. These two pieces of evidence measured grades, not hours, so the time-saving thresholds were not applied. Self-testing and Item 15 (spread the same time over several days) are the two highest-rated methods in the same review; use them together.
Sources
Yang C, Luo L, Vadillo MA, Yu R, Shanks DR (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309;Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Spread the same amount of time over several days; don't learn it all in one go
Value for cost High
In plain terms
With the same amount of time, studying spread over several days sticks better than studying all at once. 317 experiments tested this, and the conclusion is consistent. There is also a practical rule: the longer you need to remember something, the longer the gap between reviews should be. If the exam is tomorrow, review the same day; if the exam is a month away, go over it every few days.
Cost
No money, and the total time stays the same. Only the schedule changes: the same 3 hours, split into 1 hour on each of three days. The hard part is starting several days ahead instead of putting it off until the last night.
No moneyDone in passingSome willpowerBenefit size large
Benefit
A meta-analysis pooling 184 articles, 317 experiments and 839 assessments of the effect of distributed practice. It compared two things: studying in one go versus in several separate sessions (the spacing effect), and short gaps versus long gaps (the lag effect). The conclusion is that the gap between reviews and “how long afterward you need to remember” together determine retention on the final test: the longer the period you need to retain something, the longer the review gap that gives the best retention. Another review, which evaluated ten common study methods one by one, rated distributed practice in the top tier (high utility).
Evidence grade
A
Notes
It works best stacked with Item 14 (close the book and test yourself): spread the self-testing itself over several days. The materials in the Cepeda meta-analysis were mostly things like memorizing word lists; it gives no general number of days for the best gap with complex content. “The further off the test, the longer the gap” is the rule the original gives, with no specific schedule. Cramming the night before an exam helps on the spot; the problem is that you forget it fast.
Sources
Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354;Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Don't make highlighting, rereading and writing summaries your main way of studying
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
The methods students use most are highlighting and rereading, yet in the ranking of ten common study methods both are in the lowest tier. Writing summaries, the keyword mnemonic and imagining pictures for a text are also in the lowest tier. They are not completely useless; the conditions under which they work are just too narrow, and the same time spent on self-testing pays off better.
Cost
No money, and it actually saves time. The hard part is that these are the easiest to do and give the strongest feeling of “I'm studying.”
No moneyDone in passingSome willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
A review that evaluated ten common study methods assigned ratings by “whether the effect generalizes across learning conditions, student characteristics, materials and forms of assessment.” Rated in the top tier were practice testing and distributed practice. Rated in the middle tier were elaborative interrogation, self-explanation and interleaved practice. The five rated in the lowest tier were: summarization, highlighting (or underlining), the keyword mnemonic, imagery for text, and rereading. The review states: most students say they use rereading and highlighting, but these two do not reliably improve performance and should be replaced with other methods, for example using practice testing in place of rereading.
Evidence grade
A
Notes
Underlining can be used to “mark which spots you will test yourself on in a moment”; what goes wrong is treating the underlining itself as studying. The review also makes clear that the lowest tier does not equal zero; it only means the conditions under which they work are narrow and more research is needed. For the actions to use instead, see Item 14 (close the book and test yourself) and Item 15 (spread the same time over several days).
Sources
Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Practice several problem types mixed together; don't do twenty of one type in a row
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
Doing a long run of the same type of problem goes smoothly at the time, but afterward you may not be able to tell which method to use. Practicing several types shuffled together works better in the long run, by a medium amount. But this trick depends on the material: it works best for practicing with images and with categorization, less for math problems, and for memorizing vocabulary, practicing in blocks is actually better.
Cost
No money. Instead of working through the exercise book type by type in order, do the problems shuffled. The hard part is that mixed practice gives lower accuracy at the time, which feels like going backward.
No moneyDone in passingSome willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
A multilevel meta-analysis including 59 studies, 238 effect sizes and 158 samples. The overall effect of interleaved practice relative to blocked practice was medium (Hedges' g = 0.42). By material: paintings did best (g = 0.67), and other visual materials also did fairly well; for math tasks the effect was smaller (g = 0.34); for expository text and taste materials the overall effect was not significant; for vocabulary, blocked practice was actually better (g = −0.39). Regression analysis showed: the more similar the categories are to each other, the less similar the items within a category are, and the more complex the material, the greater the benefit of interleaving.
Evidence grade
A
Notes
The review cited in Item 16 (don't make highlighting your main way of studying) rated interleaved practice in the middle tier, on the grounds that there was not yet enough research at the time. Taking the two together, the way to use it is: practice mixed for content where you need to “recognize which type this is and which method to use,” such as math problem types, medical cases and applying legal provisions; practice in blocks for content you just have to memorize, such as vocabulary and definitions of terms.
Sources
Brunmair M, Richter T (2019). Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. Psychological Bulletin, 145(11), 1029–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000209
Don't choose study methods by “I'm a visual learner, he's an auditory learner”
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
Many people believe everyone has their own learning style, such as visual or auditory, and that teaching matched to that style works better. Very few studies have seriously tested this; almost none support it, and several found exactly the opposite. People do have their own preferences, but there is no evidence that teaching matched to preferences makes people learn better, so there's no need to pay for a learning-style assessment.
Cost
No money. You just stop choosing materials and courses by this classification, and stop paying for learning-style assessments.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size small
Benefit
A review commissioned to assess the evidence on learning styles pointed out: to show that “teaching matched to learning style” works, students must first be grouped by style, then the students in each group randomly assigned to different teaching methods, and finally all given the same test. The criterion for effectiveness is the appearance of a specific interaction: the teaching method that works best for one style is not the one that works best for another style. The review concluded: this interaction was almost never found; although the literature on learning styles is large, very few studies used an adequate experimental design, and several of those had results that directly contradicted the “meshing hypothesis.” On this basis the authors concluded that the current evidence is not enough to support using learning-style assessments in educational practice.
Evidence grade
A
Notes
The review also makes clear that this does not mean every version of learning-style theory has been tested and refuted; many have never been tested at all. What to avoid is these two things: paying for a learning-style assessment, and choosing training courses by style. For the criteria for choosing training, see Item 9 (take training through government-subsidized channels first) and Item 13 (prefer short programs that lead straight to a job).
Sources
Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R (2008). Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
For material you have to memorize, make up questions in the form you will use it later and test yourself; don't just memorize it word for word once and call it done
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
The benefit of closing the book and testing yourself does not stop at the exact words you memorized. Pooling 192 comparisons and more than ten thousand people, it also helps with questions in a different format and with application and reasoning questions, by a small-to-moderate amount. But there are two cases where it barely helps: swapping the question and the answer, and content you only saw in the book and were never tested on.
Cost
No money, and no extra time either. Only the way you practice changes: swap “memorize it word for word once” for “make up questions in the form you will use it later and test yourself.” The hard part is that you first have to think clearly about how you will use this material later.
No moneyDone in passingSome willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
A meta-analysis pooled more than 40 years of research, including 67 published and unpublished articles, 122 experiments and 192 transfer effect sizes, with 10382 people in total. Compared with a control of “looking at it again without being tested,” learning from practice testing does transfer to other contexts, with an effect size of d=0.40 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.50). Transfer was strongest in these situations: testing with a different question format, testing with application and inference questions, medical diagnosis problems, and testing with cue words close in meaning. Transfer was weakest in these: reversing stimulus and response, material seen during initial learning but not tested, and worked-example-type problems. Among the moderators, whether the response format matched between practice and test, whether retrieval practice with elaborated feedback had been done, and whether the initial test was answered correctly all strongly affected whether positive transfer appeared. The authors also corrected for publication bias with two methods: the moderators' effect sizes were barely affected, but the intercept estimate was pushed down markedly: when none of the conditions above is present, positive transfer often does not appear
Evidence grade
A
Notes
In everyday speech the word “memorize” (背) lumps two things together: going over the material again (rereading, highlighting), and actively recalling with the book closed. The first kind is rated lowest in the review that ranked ten study methods; to see the ratings themselves, see Item 16 (don't make highlighting, rereading and writing summaries your main way of studying). What you should do is the second kind: close the book and actively recall, see Item 14 (close the book and test yourself) for details, and spread it over several days, see Item 15 (spread over several days). The method is to first think clearly about how you will use it later: will you need to pick it out on an exam paper, or judge it on site? Then make up questions in that form and test yourself. Testing yourself once in the reverse direction is also worth doing, because in this meta-analysis transfer in the reversed direction was the weakest, so you need to practice both directions.
Sources
Pan SC, Rickard TC (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000151
For a professional title, first work out which series and which level you are in, then find the application channel according to the type of employer you work for
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
Professional titles nationwide are divided into 27 series, and each series has junior, intermediate and senior levels. Usually you apply one level at a time, moving up. If you work for an organization, it reviews your application, publicizes it and then passes it upward. If you are at a private enterprise, you can go to a professional title application service point, or apply through a talent intermediary service agency or an industry association. Freelancers apply to the evaluation organized by the local human resources and social security department.
Cost
No money. Look up your province's application notice for that year once, about half an hour.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size small
Benefit
There are 27 professional title series nationwide, for example economics, engineering, health and publishing. Professional titles come in three tiers: senior, intermediate and junior. Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Order No. 40 applies to enterprises, public institutions, social organizations and individual economic organizations, and also to freelancers. Applicants usually apply level by level. Your employer must review the materials and publicize them within the organization, for a publicity period of no less than 5 working days. For private enterprises and freelancers, a personnel agency or the like can review, publicize and recommend on your behalf. Localities must set up professional title application service points in science and technology parks, high-tech zones and similar places, and may also accept applications through talent intermediary service agencies, industry associations and chambers of commerce, and learned societies. Freelancers who meet the conditions take part, according to where they are based, in the evaluation organized by the local human resources and social security department. For materials that can be verified online, you may not be required to obtain a separate certificate. If materials are incomplete, the evaluating side must tell you all at once which ones are missing. People at private enterprises usually apply where their employment relationship is located. Those sent to work elsewhere continuously for a full year can apply where they are posted. Retired people cannot apply. Public institution staff who have received a disciplinary sanction of a recorded demerit or more severe cannot apply during the sanction period (nationwide)
Evidence grade
A
Notes
There is no unified national list of the materials you need to prepare. Each series and each province issues an application notice every year, and the materials list, application dates and performance requirements are all written in it. So the first step is to find that year's notice on your provincial human resources and social security department's official website. Papers are no longer required across the board: the 2016 reform opinions require that papers not be a hard threshold for applied talent, and set no unified requirement for the professional title foreign-language and computer exams. Skilled workers have a path too: highly skilled workers who meet the conditions can take part in professional title evaluation in the engineering series. Civil servants cannot take part in professional title evaluation.
Junior and intermediate titles such as accounting come through a unified national exam: first check your education and years of work against the requirements, then register
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
In some series, junior and intermediate titles are earned by exam: once you pass, that's it, with no separate evaluation. Accounting is like this: assistant accountant requires senior high school education or above; accountant requires a bachelor's degree plus a full 4 years of accounting work, or a junior college diploma plus a full 5 years. People who already hold certain professional qualifications may also be counted directly as holding the corresponding title.
Cost
The registration fee is paid at each province's rate. Preparing for the exam takes up several months of spare time.
A little moneyA few hoursSome willpowerBenefit size small
Benefit
The 2016 reform opinions provide that in specialties where junior and intermediate titles are obtained through a unified national exam, no corresponding evaluation or recognition is conducted any longer. In fields where professional titles and professional qualifications are closely related, obtaining the professional qualification is enough to be recognized as holding the corresponding title, and it can also serve as a condition for applying for the next higher title. Take accounting as an example. Assistant accountant and accountant use a unified national exam. Senior accountant combines exam and evaluation, and full senior accountant is generally by evaluation only. The eligibility requirements are as follows. Assistant accountant: senior high school graduation or above, including secondary specialized school, vocational high school and technical school. Accountant: a doctoral degree; or a master's degree plus a full 1 year of accounting work; or a second bachelor's degree or completion of a graduate study class, plus a full 2 years; or a bachelor's degree plus a full 4 years; or a junior college diploma plus a full 5 years. Holders of a Master of Professional Accounting or Doctor of Professional Accounting degree can be exempted from the Financial Management (财务管理) paper when taking the accountant exam (nationwide)
Evidence grade
A
Notes
Whether your series is by exam, by evaluation or a combination of the two, check that series' “Guiding Opinions on Deepening the Reform of the Professional Title System for ××.” The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the competent authorities of each industry have issued them series by series, and they can be found in the policy document library of the Chinese government's website (中国政府网). For exam registration dates and subjects, that year's exam announcement is authoritative. Civil servants can take the accounting exam but cannot take part in accounting title evaluation.
Don't use agents who get your title evaluated for you, don't buy ghostwritten papers, and don't falsify your materials: once confirmed, the title is revoked and recorded in an integrity file for 3 years
Value for cost High
In plain terms
A title obtained with fake materials, ghostwritten papers or plagiarized work is revoked once this is confirmed. The bad-faith record is kept for 3 years and also goes onto the national credit platform. If the commitment letter you signed when applying is untrue, you cannot apply again for 3 years. Human resources and social security departments also specifically investigate agents' false advertising, fake evaluations and fake certificates.
Cost
No money. The hard part is resisting ads that say “pay and you're guaranteed to pass.”
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size medium
Benefit
Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Order No. 40 provides that where a title is obtained by providing false materials, plagiarizing others' works and academic results, or by other improper means, the title is revoked. It is also recorded in the professional title evaluation integrity archive and entered into the national credit information sharing platform, with a recording period of 3 years. The 2024 supervision measures name several kinds of violations by applicants: false commitments and forged information, fabricated or ghostwritten papers, falsified work performance, and lobbying and asking for favors. Applicants must sign a personal commitment letter when applying, and if the commitment is untrue, they may not apply for 3 years. Human resources and social security departments, together with public security, cyberspace and market regulation authorities, investigate agents' fake websites, false advertising, contract traps, fake evaluations and fake certificates. Where the circumstances are serious and a crime is suspected, the case is transferred to the relevant authorities (nationwide)
Evidence grade
A
Notes
There is a way to tell real from fake: a title from a legitimate evaluation can be found on the national professional title evaluation information lookup platform. The entry points are the 12333 website, the 12333 mobile app and the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security's official website. Titles awarded by evaluation committees that have not been registered cannot be found in this system. So anyone promising “guaranteed pass,” “you don't need to take part in person” or “usable even if the certificate can't be looked up” can basically be judged to be a problem. The beneficiary is mainly you; the benefit size is judged by “avoiding a revoked title and a 3-year bad-faith record.”
Getting a professional title does not mean a pay rise: first find out whether your employer evaluates and appoints within post quotas, or whether being awarded a title does not necessarily mean being appointed to it
Value for cost Standard
In plain terms
A professional title is a basis for hiring, appraisal and promotion, but being awarded a title and being appointed to a matching post are two different things. Public institutions usually evaluate within post quotas, so if you are awarded the title you will most likely be appointed. Employers that do not practice post management can separate evaluation from appointment, so even if you are awarded the title, your employer may not give you the matching post and pay. After you change employers or places, your title may need to be re-evaluated or confirmed.
Cost
No money. Just ask your employer's HR department once.
No moneyDone in passingNo willpowerBenefit size small
Benefit
Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Order No. 40, Article 2: professional title evaluation results are an important basis for the hiring, appraisal, promotion and other decisions concerning professional and technical talent. The 2016 reform opinions provide that public institutions that fully practice post management generally conduct professional title evaluation within the post structure ratio. Employers that do not practice post management, as well as highly general-purpose series and emerging occupations, may separate evaluation from appointment. When professional and technical talent move across regions or employers, their titles are re-evaluated or confirmed according to administrative authority, except where the state provides otherwise (nationwide)
Evidence grade
B
Notes
The evidence grade is set at B because the documents only say how evaluation and appointment connect; there is no nationally unified figure for “how much your pay rises once you are awarded the title.” What you can act on: at public institutions and state-owned enterprises, first ask the HR department about your organization's post vacancies and appointment rules. At a private company, first ask the boss whether this certificate is recognized and whether it comes with more pay.